Small cities in Britain were once economic powerhouses. They were engines of industrial growth for years, supporting the larger cities in the quest for profit. However, as Acemoglu and Robinson could well predict,
creative destruction left these towns behind. As Britain's economy became increasingly more dependent on forms of production and globalized trade that differ from the old industrial model, the Northern towns that thrived under it have, naturally, been hard-hit.
The North of England's decline was forestalled by the artificial pump of government money from Tony Blair and Gordon Brown's Labour governments. Public funding went to large building projects and arts promotion as well. However, with the rapid succession of the 2008 economic crisis and the election of the David Cameron's Tories into a coalition government, that decline has deepened. The larger cities have been able to diversify their economic output, while the smaller and medium-sized ones - places like Wolverhampton, Hull, and Hartlepool - have utterly failed in this regard. All three of the cities' unemployment is well over the national average. On top of this stagnation, there's another problem;
"Fully 22% of people in Wolverhampton have no qualifications—against a
national figure of 9%. As in Hull and Hartlepool, while not all the
local schools are bad, their overall performance is appalling," ("The urban ghosts").
This has led some commentators
to suggest that, instead of building civic institutions like aquariums or art museums, it would be more appropriate for the government to help the struggling masses from these areas to relocate or commute. After all, there is a precedent for such a shift. As cottage industries declined with the advent of industrialism, vast numbers of displaced peasants moved from the Cotswolds to London and other major centers of the new economic movement. Perhaps a similar migration will save the people currently suffering in the North's languishing cities.