The Diffusion of Destruction

In chapter 10, Acemoglu and Robinson make the argument that it was France's invasion into much of Western Europe that allowed it to impose inclusive political institutions in those areas including rule of law, the dismantling of the feudal system, and the weakening of guilds which eventually led to the creation of wealth.

However, unlike France's invasions, America's invasion of Iraq did not result in the establishment of inclusive political and economic institutions. Why have America's efforts to stabilize the country not had the same results? This issue is incredibly complex, but from a perspective geared towards the reading, I argue that America failed to promote centralization, establish rule of law, and stamp out corruption based on religious differences in the country. Citizens cannot participate inclusive institutions like voting when their government is unable to guarantee basic security and ensure fair elections. Terrorism and Iraq's dark history with extractive institutions make an easy, quick transition to an inclusive government a dream. The United States should have made strengthening the government, reducing corruption, and establishing rule of law priorities over large military engagements. Institutional solidarity, created with Iraq's unique culture in mind, should have been a bigger priority.